Shoshana Weissmann, digital director at the R Street Institute, has expressed concerns over Colorado’s House Bill 1291, describing it as a politically motivated measure that unfairly targets the rideshare industry.
“Give this a read,” said Weissmann. “It’s literally just a “we hate rideshare” bill and pretty obviously so.”
According to an analysis by the R Street Institute, Colorado’s HB 1291, while presented as a public safety initiative, imposes regulations that could negatively impact the state’s economy, consumer choice, and civil liberties. The bill includes requirements for fingerprint-based background checks and audio/video recording of rides. These measures are deemed unnecessary and potentially infringe on privacy rights. The analysis suggests these mandates could reduce driver availability, increase costs for riders, and disproportionately affect low-income and minority workers. Similar policies have previously led to rideshare companies withdrawing from cities like Austin, Texas.
The bill aims to enhance rideshare safety but has ignited significant debate. Uber has threatened to exit Colorado if the bill is enacted. Initially inspired by a lawmaker’s personal experience with assault, the bill has been revised significantly. It no longer includes mandatory ride recording or real-time identity checks but still requires semiannual background checks and rapid driver deactivation following complaints. Additionally, it introduces a private right of action for riders in cases of assault or injury. Uber and Lyft oppose the legislation due to high compliance costs and potential legal issues.
Both Uber and Lyft have urged Colorado Governor Jared Polis to veto HB 1291. Lyft joined Uber in opposing the bill through a letter to Polis highlighting concerns about vague language and restrictions not applicable to other ride services. The bill’s provisions include new background check requirements, bans on drivers offering food or drink, mandatory in-car recording, and expanded liability allowing passengers to sue. Both companies object particularly to data-sharing provisions involving driver information.
Weissmann is also known for her work at the R Street Institute on various issues such as occupational licensing reform and social media regulation. Her policy work often draws from personal experiences related to technology and child identity theft.
